Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance

Fair food for all Australians

  • First Peoples First
  • About
    • History
    • Our Team
      • Current National Committee
      • Past committees
    • Governance
    • President’s report
    • International
    • Press
      • In the News
      • Media Releases
    • Get in touch
  • Farmers
    • Farming on Other People’s Land
    • The Agroecology Action Research Network
    • Community Supported Agriculture
    • Workers’ Rights
  • Legal Defence Fund
    • Our Services
    • Who we support
    • Campaigns
    • Past efforts
    • Our Vision
  • Peoples’ Food Plan
  • CSA
  • Events
    • Fair Food Week
    • Food Sovereignty Convergence 15-24 Oct 2020
      • Watch: Food Sovereignty Convergence 2020
    • AFSA Solidarity Economy Sessions
      • Why solidarity economies?
      • What is a solidarity economy?
  • Submissions
  • Join Us
    • Join Us
    • AFSA Members’ Sesssions
  • Buy the Book!
    • Farming Democracy
    • Cart

Farming on Other People’s Land (FOOPL)

The FOOPL Project

At the 2019 AGM, AFSA announced the creation of FOOPL – a new channel to help grow new growers, support young farmers, and facilitate access to land for aspiring growers all over Australia. FOOPL also references that all non-indigenous Australian farmers are farming on other peoples’ land – First Peoples’ Country.

FOOPL activities support and encourage new farming ventures on existing farms and underutilised land, including support for young and new farmers to develop skills and tools for successful farm enterprises. FOOPL supports actions which:

  • share knowledge, resources, expertise and skillsets; 
  • enhance and strengthen local food communities;
  • enable young households achievable access to land and accommodation; 
  • reduce structural social inequalities; 
  • produce healthy food at the local level; and 

Through FOOPL, AFSA also supports growing more growers through:

  • documenting and disseminating successful land sharing and share farming enterprises; 
  • creating training and mentoring programs in agroecology and collaborative decision-making; 
  • the provision of microloans and small grants; 
  • networking amongst small farmers and landholders; and 
  • identifying performance indicators of successful land sharing and share farming ventures. 

Farming on Other People’s Land

Guiding Principles for a Landshare Farming Agreement

Note:  these principles are provided for discussion purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice.  Please contact AFSA’s LDF legal advisor if you need tailored advice in relation to a landshare farming arrangement.

Landholder – the party that owns or leases the land on which the landshare farming enterprise will take place

Landshare farmer – the party that will run a farming enterprise on the Landholder’s land

  1. Acknowledge on whose traditional lands parties are/will be farming. Discuss how Landholder and Landshare farmer can contribute to Indigenous sovereignty, land restitution, paying the rent, and decolonising approaches to agriculture. This may be done by stating one’s relationship to the Indigenous peoples on whose Lands the farming operation will take place. Build this understanding and practical resolutions throughout the document as appropriate.
  2. For context, define the background of both parties, setting out what resources and skills each party is bringing to the landsharing relationship. This can be set out up front in the agreement as Recitals, or could be included in an annexure if the objectives are lengthy.
  3. Who are the parties to the agreement? Are they individuals, businesses or incorporated associations for instance?
  4. Clearly define the landshare farming enterprise to be undertaken (eg horticulture, pasture-raised animals, dairy).
  5. What is the term of the agreement? Consider extensions (eg initial year with annual renewals).
  6. Clearly define the geographical area that will be landshare farmed (eg through the inclusion of a map).
  7. Detail how the farm enterprise income will be shared (often expressed as a percentage, eg 80% landshare farmer, 20% landholder), when it will be paid, whether there will be deductions for use of equipment etc.
  8. Detail how the farm produce will be farmed if methods are important to the parties – eg agroecologically, regeneratively, organically, biodynamically. This is an important factor if inputs are to be used.  Also how are the products to be marketed – a farmgate operation is more significant for a landshare farming arrangement than, say, delivery at farmers markets.
  9. Define who is responsible for what – the day to day roles, but also who has the authority on decisions (eg if equipment breaks, can the landshare farmer incur expenditure having it repaired or does the equipment owner solely make that call – and in what timeframe if the landshare farmer is dependent on that equipment).
  10. Consider if it is an exclusive arrangement or whether other landshare farmers may also be present on the land, and if so, how this is expected to work in practical terms (eg landshare farmers must work cooperatively and collaboratively together).
  11. Clearly define (even in table format) what is to be paid for and/or owned by the landholder and what is to be paid for/owned by the landshare farmer – eg the produce, plant/equipment, land rates, water, fencing etc.
  12. Regulatory matters – the parties should conduct a detailed investigation regarding what regulatory approvals or permits may be necessary (i.e Local Laws, Planning, NLIS for livestock, PIC number) and agree on a plan for compliance or considered non-compliance, including determining who is responsible for which actions.
  13. Include a communication and decision-making protocol – valuing open communication, honesty, and consensus for instance. This leads into the dispute resolution procedure below.
  14. Include a practical dispute resolution procedure and the types of disputes that will activate it, noting this should also cover multiple landshare farmers if applicable.
  15. As the ATO views income from landshare farming as taxable (primary production income) it may be prudent to have a clause in the agreement that the landshare farmer is responsible for their own taxation and may need to set themselves up as a business or independent contractor (with an ABN). Otherwise there is a risk they could be construed as employed farmers which would bring in all the tax/legal obligations in the employer/employee relationship.
  16. Likewise it would be worth checking off the arrangement with Workcover to ascertain whether workers compensation insurance needs to be obtained (eg due to work exchange arrangements where either the farmer or the landholder provide regular labour for each other).
  17. Consider insurance responsibilities – public liability, third party etc. Will the landshare farmer itself have employees it will need to arrange WorkCover for?
  18. Branding and associations – consider issues such as how “visible” the landowner will be, sometimes they are retiring farmers with an existing brand that will be taken on by the landshare farmer, other times they just wish to be a “silent” partner. Consider advertising material and promotions – what are the parties’ positions on these?
  19. Detail what happens when the landshare farmer is sick/absent, a clause on providing a competent replacement preferably in advance is a good idea.
  20. Is there any residential tenancy involved, i.e. will the landshare farmer live onsite and what are the terms of that arrangement?
  21. Include a conclusion of the agreement clause, acknowledging that most landshare farming arrangements will end either by design or by mutual agreement when one or both decide it is time. Build a custodial ethic into this clause that acknowledges the need for continued care of the Land and each other as the agreement dissolves, with appropriate timeframes that reflect this ethic. Further considerations might include: If the landshare farmer has made improvements to the property, how will this be dealt with? In what condition must the land be relinquished (e.g. “in good and substantial repair”).
  22. Assignment – can the landshare farmer assign this agreement (for instance because they sell or assign their farming business)? If so on what conditions can assignment occur (eg with the consent of the landholder which shall not be unreasonably withheld)?

Download a pdf of these guiding principles here.

Search

Recent Posts

  • Book review: Everything You Need to Know About the Uluru Statement From The Heart
  • Submission to the possible establishment of an independent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Queensland
  • Take our survey to help shape your Peoples’ Food Plan!
  • AFSA responds to an Inquiry on Australian Government’s application of the UNDRIP in Australia
  • AFSA Values & Theory of Change

Read more about…

Latest submissions

Fair food for all: AFSA response to the NSW Inquiry into Food Production and Supply

Since we first published the People’s Food Plan in 2013, AFSA has continued to gather democratically to listen to the views of farmers and allies across the country and around the world to continue to deepen and strengthen our positions on what constitutes the most socially just and ecologically sound food and agriculture systems.  AFSA […]

AFSA categorically rejects proposals to expand intensive aquaculture into Commonwealth waters

  The Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance (AFSA) categorically rejects proposals to expand intensive aquaculture into Commonwealth waters. We need a radical paradigm shift away from Blue Economy to Blue Justice in fisheries, which is crucial for climate justice, encompassing economic, social, and environmental justice. The 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services reported […]

AFSA responds to the ACT Capital Food and Fibre Strategy

  AFSA recently responded to the call for submissions to the ACT Capital Food and Fibre Strategy, which will “be a roadmap to delivering social, environmental and economic benefits based on secure, climate-resilient food and fibre production across in the ACT; and respond to the need to mitigate climate challenges via adaptation and diversification. It […]

A Licence to Sell Lettuce? ASFA Submission to FSANZ Proposal

  For three years FSANZ has been working on a proposal to more tightly regulate the production and sale of berries, leafy vegetables, and melons after several outbreaks of listeria, e coli, and salmonella from large monocultures. AFSA has provided feedback from the beginning on the need to approach any changes with a scale-appropriate lens […]

Protecting farmers and preserving farm land: Submission on the Protections within the Victorian Planning Framework

In October 2021 the Victorian Legislative Council tasked the Environment and Planning Committee to inquire into and report on: “the adequacy of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and Victorian planning framework in relation to planning and heritage protection”. Particular terms of reference were outlined for the Committee to address and AFSA provides its submission […]

Newsletter

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Become a member

Join or renew

Already a member?

Login

Update membership details

Recent posts

  • Book review: Everything You Need to Know About the Uluru Statement From The Heart August 3, 2022
  • Submission to the possible establishment of an independent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Queensland July 28, 2022
  • Take our survey to help shape your Peoples’ Food Plan! June 3, 2022
  • AFSA responds to an Inquiry on Australian Government’s application of the UNDRIP in Australia June 2, 2022
  • AFSA Values & Theory of Change May 26, 2022

Copyright © 2022 · Outreach Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in