Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance

Fair food for all Australians

  • First Peoples First
  • About
    • History
    • Our Team
      • Current National Committee
      • Past committees
    • Governance
    • President’s report
    • International
    • Press
      • In the News
      • Media Releases
    • Get in touch
  • Farmers
    • Farming on Other People’s Land
    • The Agroecology Action Research Network
    • Community Supported Agriculture
    • Workers’ Rights
  • Legal Defence Fund
    • Our Services
    • Who we support
    • Campaigns
    • Past efforts
    • Our Vision
  • Peoples’ Food Plan
  • CSA
  • Events
    • Fair Food Week
    • Food Sovereignty Convergence 15-24 Oct 2020
      • Watch: Food Sovereignty Convergence 2020
    • AFSA Solidarity Economy Sessions
      • Why solidarity economies?
      • What is a solidarity economy?
  • Submissions
  • Join Us
    • Join Us
    • AFSA Members’ Sesssions
  • Buy the Book!
    • Farming Democracy
    • Cart

Countering industrial orthodoxy

May 5, 2015 by Alana Mann

Story by Tammi Jonas, AFSA President, May 2015

farm-to-consumerOn Monday the 27th of April, over 40 Australian farmers, chefs, providores and assorted supporters, journalists and academics came together to discuss the potential for an Australian organisation similar to the American Farm to Consumer Defence Fund.

logo_textTogether with the support of Lisa Heenan and Darren Doherty of Regrarians and Guy and Liz Grossi, AFSA welcomed Joel Salatin of Polyface fame to address the group on the topic of ‘A Fair & Regenerative Food System’. Over the course of a very full day punctuated by some very delicious food graciously provided by the Grossis, we worked through the issues as we see them and what Australian growers and eaters can do about them.

Joel’s talk was (predictably) equal parts inspiring and entertaining. He commenced with a quick history of the industrialization of agriculture, and how with industrialization came long supply chains and decreasing transparency. As industrialization led to a fear of what we couldn’t see, we ended up with an industrial food regulation system.

Joel then gave us some trademark pearls of wisdom:

  • industrial orthodoxy is scale prejudicial – it’s easy to scale up, but can’t scale down
  • industrial orthodoxy is extremely subjective – one day the regulators expect your boning room to be blue, the next pink, the next green (and I’ll add that some of them might be colourblind)
  • industrial orthodoxy is adversarial – it sets regulators and regulated up as adversaries from the outset
  • industrial orthodoxy is efficiency-prejudiced – eg. increased throughput at an abattoir is cause for celebration, instead of increased welfare at that same abattoir
  • industrial orthodoxy doesn’t inform, it just codifies.

Joel asked the provocative question, “what will our children think of the current orthodoxy that safe food is sterile?”

This culture of sterility says:

  • Coca Cola is safe but raw milk is dangerous;
  • spreadable cheese product is safe but Roquefort is dangerous; and
  • petroleum-based fertilizer is safe but compost is dangerous.

While some of us are engaged in re-building a food system outside of contemporary industrial orthodoxies, Joel points out that there are new areas of conflict ahead. The re-zoning and claiming of agricultural land for urban development is just one planning problem we face, and it’s a big one. He’s also concerned about insurance policies written for an industrial society rather than your small, local farmer who just needs a farm hand, and the restrictions on housing more than one nuclear family when regenerative farming takes many hands – we need ‘more eyes per acre’, not less.

While some of the issues Joel raised may be more specific to the United States, his remedies resonate. First and foremost, we need food sovereignty laws to establish the people’s right to collectively determine our own food and agriculture systems.

Such laws could, as Wyoming has recently done, exempt all direct producer to consumer transactions from the usual regulatory framework (meat and dairy are excluded). Or they could be exempt based on numerical scale – this sort of exemption already exists in many examples of legislation. Exemptions could be based on location, description, empirical testing, or, Joel suggests, complete circumvention.

In the US, they have the Farm to Consumer Legal Defence Fund, which was established in the mid-2000s to protect people’s right to sell or acquire the food of their choice, and to protect against harassment by regulating authorities. The Fund operates a 24/7 hotline for producers to ring for immediate advice when the ‘food police’ roll up their driveway.

Joel says he’s used it three times, and the last time was when authorities destroyed some of his eggs in a restaurant for not being stamped – the chef rang Joel, who rang the hotline, who rang the authority, who withdrew their claim against Joel within 24 hours. As Joel says, if he’d been left on his own to fight the regulator, he’d still be trying.

Joel finished off by asking how can we embrace live food again? The current system has centralized risk and removed responsibility and with it, choice. What we need to do is de-centralise risk and distribute responsibility.

The rest of the day was spent working through the issues producers, providores, chefs and eaters are facing in our attempts to grow, buy and eat the food of our choice, and commencing the discussion of what an organization like the Farm to Consumer Legal Defence Fund in Australia might look like.

Do we need a hotline? Templates to assist producers in complying with regulations? Templates to assist council in understanding how they can support flourishing local food economies? Advocacy for legal reform?

We’re interested in your views.

If you want to learn more or support our work with the Regrarians and the Grossis to establish an organization like America’s Farm to Consumer Legal Defence Fund, drop us a line at admin@afsa.org.au.au. Or even better, join AFSA today – every voice makes us stronger and helps us build a fair food future for Australia.

Filed Under: Legal Defence Fund Tagged With: American Farm to Consumer Defence Fund, food safety, regulation

Support Food Sovereignty

Join or renew your AFSA membership today!

Search

Recent Posts

  • AFSA denounces misinformation from the far right in response to the Victorian Government’s ALA Bill
  • AFSA urges the Federal Government to change its definition of primary producers, to include smallholders seeking critical disaster recovery funding
  • AFSA is expanding: Join our National Committee or sub-committees and working groups
  • AFSA response to the National Biosecurity Strategy
  • Global perspectives: An update on AFSA’s international advocacy

Read more about…

Latest submissions

AFSA responds to the ACT Capital Food and Fibre Strategy

  AFSA recently responded to the call for submissions to the ACT Capital Food and Fibre Strategy, which will “be a roadmap to delivering social, environmental and economic benefits based on secure, climate-resilient food and fibre production across in the ACT; and respond to the need to mitigate climate challenges via adaptation and diversification. It […]

A Licence to Sell Lettuce? ASFA Submission to FSANZ Proposal

  For three years FSANZ has been working on a proposal to more tightly regulate the production and sale of berries, leafy vegetables, and melons after several outbreaks of listeria, e coli, and salmonella from large monocultures. AFSA has provided feedback from the beginning on the need to approach any changes with a scale-appropriate lens […]

Protecting farmers and preserving farm land: Submission on the Protections within the Victorian Planning Framework

In October 2021 the Victorian Legislative Council tasked the Environment and Planning Committee to inquire into and report on: “the adequacy of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and Victorian planning framework in relation to planning and heritage protection”. Particular terms of reference were outlined for the Committee to address and AFSA provides its submission […]

AFSA supports proposed changes to landscape rehydration infrastructure planning rules in NSW

The Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance (AFSA) supports the proposed changes to landscape rehydration infrastructure planning rules and applauds the NSW Government’s initiative to allow farmers to restore streams on their property through landscape rehydration techniques, without the need for council approval. AFSA represents small and medium scale producers and our vision is to enable regenerative […]

AFSA opposes JBS acquisition of Rivalea

The proposed acquisition raises a number of concerns for AFSA and our directly-affected members—small and medium-scale pastured pig farmers in Victoria. The concerns centre around the certainty of continued access for service kills and a lack of choice, reflective of a lack of competition, in the state for small-scale farmers accessing service kills. At a […]

Newsletter

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Become a member

Join or renew

Already a member?

Login

Update membership details

Recent posts

  • AFSA denounces misinformation from the far right in response to the Victorian Government’s ALA Bill May 13, 2022
  • AFSA urges the Federal Government to change its definition of primary producers, to include smallholders seeking critical disaster recovery funding April 8, 2022
  • AFSA is expanding: Join our National Committee or sub-committees and working groups April 1, 2022
  • AFSA response to the National Biosecurity Strategy March 21, 2022
  • Global perspectives: An update on AFSA’s international advocacy March 17, 2022

Copyright © 2022 · Outreach Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in